ZELEX SLE 2.0 vs Erovenus Max Series – Which Sex Doll Torso Is Right for You?
Love the idea of a lifelike torso but not sure which one to choose? In this comparison, we’ll take a close look at two popular silicone torsos: the ZELEX SLE 2.0 Betta.E (108cm / 3ft7, J-cup) and the Erovenus Max Series Kimberly (106cm / 3ft6, F-cup). Let’s break down their key differences to help you decide which one fits your preferences best.
⭐Comparison Rating Summary
| Dimension | ZELEX Betta E | Erovenus Kimberly | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Impressions | 9 | 9 | Both arrive well-packaged, intact, and odor-free; Kimberly feels fresh and youthful, while Betta.E delivers a more mature and sensual allure. |
| Weight & Handling | 8.7 | 8.3 | Betta.E is lighter (30kg) and easier to move; Kimberly is slightly heavier (33.4kg). |
| Softness & Bounce | 8.7 | 9 | Betta.E uses gel-filled breasts & butt for extra softness; Kimberly’s ultra-soft silicone feels more natural overall. |
| Visual Realism | 8 | 8.8 | Betta.E has bolder makeup for a mature look; Kimberly offers finer detailing with a youthful vibe. |
| Body Painting & Skin Detailing | 8.5 | 8.7 | Betta.E: Stronger contrast and bold detailing, great for those who prefer a mature, sexy appearance; Kimberly: More refined and natural, ideal for those seeking lifelike softness and subtle realism. |
| Vaginal Texture & Sensation | 8.8 | 9 | Both are dual-channel, but Kimberly provides tighter fit and stronger internal textures. |
| Posability & Joints | 8.5 | 8.5 | Similar waist flexibility; torso-only design limits extreme posing. |
| Functionality & Usability | 8 | 8.3 | Both include ROS head with movable jaw and dual-channel access; Kimberly offers more stimulating oral textures. |
| Value for Money | 9 | 8.5 | Betta.E is more budget-friendly ($1,100); Kimberly is pricier ($1,399 + $150 textured oral option) but delivers premium detailing. |
| Overall Score | 8.6 | 8.7 | Performance is close – Betta.E excels in convenience and balance, while Kimberly shines in realism and immersive feel. |
Overall Summary
- ZELEX Betta.E Average Score: 8.6/ 10
- Erovenus Kimberly Average Score: 8.7 / 10
Both perform well, with subtle differences in weight, detailing, and tactile realism.
- Betta.E: Lightweight, convenient, balanced softness, affordable.
- Kimberly: Heavier, refined detailing, stronger textures, more immersive experience.
First Impressions: Which One Wins?
- Betta.E: Wheat-toned skin with a voluptuous BBW figure—full breasts and hips create a bold, sensual impression. Her face carries a more mature charm, exuding sex appeal from the start.
Kimberly: White skin with smooth, youthful Western-style features. Her curvy body and fuller hips stand out immediately, giving a premium and elegant vibe right out of the box.
✅ Verdict: Both arrive in discreet packaging with full accessories and protective foam layers. Kimberly feels fresh and youthful, while Betta E delivers a more mature and sensual allure.
108cm
106cm
Weight & Handling
- Betta.E: 108cm tall with a J-cup bust. At 73.7 lbs/30kg, she’s relatively lightweight, making her easy to lift, move, or reposition—even on softer surfaces.
- Kimberly: 106cm tall with an F-cup bust. At 66.1lbs /33.4kg, she’s a bit heavier, which adds to her solid, realistic presence, though it does require more effort when handling.
✅ Verdict: Betta.E is the more convenient option for those who value easy movement and manageability. Kimberly, while heavier, rewards you with a sturdier and more lifelike feel.
Softness & Bounce
- Betta E: Uses gel-filled breasts and buttocks, giving them a soft and bouncy feel. The softness is noticeable, but the overall elasticity is slightly less than ultra-soft silicone.
- Kimberly: Features ultra-soft silicone breasts and buttocks, which feel even softer and more pliable than Betta E. The silicone allows for a more natural bounce and realistic touch.
✅Verdict: Both dolls offer high-quality, lifelike softness. Betta E provides a pleasantly soft and bouncy experience with its gel-filled features, while Kimberly’s ultra-soft silicone gives a slightly softer, more natural feel overall, making it ideal for those seeking maximum realism in breasts and buttocks.
Vagina Softness Comparison
When it comes to vaginal softness, both ZELEX Betta E and Erovenus Kimberly perform exceptionally well. Each uses premium soft materials, delivering a realistic, flexible, and comfortable experience.
There is no clear advantage between the two in this regard—both torsos offer a natural, lifelike feel that closely mimics the softness and elasticity of real skin. As a result, both are equally satisfying in terms of vaginal softness.
Visual Realism
- Betta.E: Comes with a wig. Makeup is slightly rougher, featuring drawn-on brows, glued upper lashes, and implanted lower lashes that create a mature, sexy look. Body textures are present but less finely detailed.
- Kimberly: Features rooted hair with implanted brows and lashes. The makeup is more delicate, highlighting a youthful, girlish charm. Freckles, soft blush, and enhanced body textures add to its realistic, lifelike appeal.
✅Verdict: Both present Western-style aesthetics. Betta E emphasizes a mature, sensual vibe, while Kimberly offers a softer, youthful appearance with more refined detailing.
Body Painting & Skin Detailing Comparison
Betta.E:
Skin tone is warmer, leaning toward a healthy tan.
Areola and nipple coloring is stronger with higher contrast, creating a bold, mature, and sexy look.
Genital area features deeper shading with visible folds and texture, emphasizing detail but giving a slightly heavier makeup effect.
Kimberly:
Skin tone is lighter and fairer, closer to a youthful Western complexion.
Areola and nipple coloring shows softer transitions, blending naturally with the lighter skin tone for a delicate, girlish vibe.
Genital area coloring is more natural, with subtle shading that blends smoothly with the surrounding skin, achieving a realistic and refined finish.
✅Verdict:
Betta.E’s body painting highlights a mature and sensual style with stronger contrasts and bolder detailing, while Kimberly focuses on a delicate and natural aesthetic, with more refined shading and lifelike softness.
Vaginal Texture & Stretching
- Betta.E: Dual-channel design with moderate internal textures. Elastic walls create a soft, pleasurable experience without being overly intense.
- Kimberly: Dual-channel design with more pronounced textures and a snugger fit. Provides a tighter, more realistic, and deeply enveloping sensation.
✅Verdict: Both feature dual-channel structures, but while Betta E offers a balanced, comfortably stimulating experience, Kimberly delivers stronger textures and a tighter embrace for a more immersive feel.
Functionality & Usability
- Betta.E: Equipped with a ROS head featuring a movable jaw. Both vaginal and anal channels are fully accessible and provide a smooth, functional experience.
- Kimberly: Also comes with a ROS head, but with added detail—its oral cavity includes small raised textures for enhanced stimulation. The dual channels are snug and consistent, offering reliable use.
✅Verdict: Both dolls are practical and user-friendly. However, Kimberly stands out with its textured oral cavity and tighter channels, delivering slightly more stimulation and a more engaging overall experience.
Joints & Posability
- Betta.E: Features a flexible waist and hips. While the torso-only design restricts certain extreme poses, it still allows for natural seated and reclining positions.
- Kimberly: Offers similar flexibility in the waist and hips. The addition of thigh stubs improves stability and makes seated poses feel more natural.
✅Verdict: Both dolls provide practical and balanced flexibility. Though the torso design limits some advanced posing, each is well-suited for natural and comfortable positioning.
Value for Money
- Betta.E: Priced at $1,100, it includes a free ROS oral head (without internal textures). Delivers a solid balance of quality, softness, and accessibility at an affordable price point.
- Kimberly: Priced at $1,399. The ROS oral head with textured interior is available for an additional $150, offering enhanced tactile realism along with more refined detailing.
Verdict: Both options represent strong value. Betta E is the more budget-friendly choice, while Kimberly appeals to those seeking premium realism and finer craftsmanship, making it worth the higher investment.
✅ Conclusion and Recommendations
Both torsos perform impressively, with subtle differences in weight, detailing, and tactile realism.
Betta.E: Lightweight, convenient, with balanced softness at an affordable price.
Kimberly: Slightly heavier, with refined detailing, stronger textures, and a more immersive, realistic experience.
In short: Betta.E delivers convenience and balance, while Kimberly offers realism and intensity.
Which one would you choose for your collection? Share your thoughts in the comments and join the discussion in our community!
👉 We test, you enjoy!
Want to know more?
Check out our in-depth blog reviews:
Betta E Review: https://www.sexdollacademy.com/zelex-sle-2-0-sex-doll-torso-betta-e-review/
Kimberly Review: https://www.sexdollacademy.com/sino-doll-in-depth-review-soft-max-80cm-silicone-torso-linbi/
Prefer videos?
We’ve also made detailed unboxing & review videos for both dolls—head over to sexdolltv.com to watch them now!
